Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Sustainable Management Review
Articles

Reconceptualizing University Libraries as Knowledge Ecosystems: Rethinking the Roles and Management of Academic Libraries

Baohua Wang
SEGi University
Zhang Yi
SEGi University
Xiaoming Li
SEGi University
Wei Yet Tan
SEGi University

Published 2026-03-17

Keywords

  • Knowledge Ecosystem,
  • University Libraries,
  • Knowledge Sharing,
  • Learning Environment0,
  • Academic Library

How to Cite

Wang , B., Yi, Z., Li , X., & Tan , W. Y. (2026). Reconceptualizing University Libraries as Knowledge Ecosystems: Rethinking the Roles and Management of Academic Libraries. Sustainable Management Review, 1(2), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.70693/smr.v1i2.11

Abstract

University libraries are undergoing profound transformation in response to digitalization, open science, and evolving academic practices. Traditional perspectives primarily conceptualize libraries as collection-centered repositories or information service institutions. While these views have shaped professional development, they insufficiently capture the dynamic and systemic nature of contemporary academic libraries. This study reconceptualizes the university library as a knowledge ecosystem. Drawing upon knowledge ecosystem theory, knowledge sharing theory, and learning environment perspectives, the paper proposes a four-component model consisting of knowledge resources, human participants, learning environments, and knowledge interaction. The model emphasizes interdependence, co-evolution, and collaborative knowledge creation within the academic context. Based on this framework, the study derives managerial implications that reposition libraries as knowledge hubs, librarians as facilitators, and libraries as academic communities. By integrating theoretical analysis with practical insights, this research provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and guiding the future development of university libraries.

References

  1. Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4):98– 107.
  2. Auckland, M. (2012).
  3. Bennett, S. (2009). Borgman, C. L. (2007).
  4. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., and Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations. Public Administration Review, 66(s1):44–55.
  5. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., and Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7):1164–1176.
  6. Corrall, S. (2010). Educating the academic librarian as a blended professional: A review and case study. Library Management, (8/9):567–584.
  7. Foss, N. J., Husted, K., and Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management studies, 47(3):455–482.
  8. Järvi, K., Almpanopoulou, A., and Ritala, P. (2018). Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms. Research Policy, 47(8):1523–1537.
  9. Julien, H. and Genuis, S. K. (2011). Librarians’ experiences of the teaching role: A national survey of librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2):103–111.
  10. Lankes, R. D. (2011).
  11. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1):14–37.
  12. Pinfield, S., Cox, A. M., and Smith, J. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Relationships, activities, drivers and influences. PLOS ONE, 9(12).
  13. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1):116–145.
  14. Suber, P. (2012).
  15. Tenopir, C., Birch, B., and Allard, S. (2012).
  16. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., and Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in knowledge production. Science, (5827):1036–1039.